I have recently reread Ian McEwan’s Atonement and rewatched the film. I have not read this book since I was seventeen.
I have found myself drawn to contemplating the character of Briony and to considering why I find her so unlikeable, comparing the film and the novel to try and draw out my distaste. I enjoyed the vignette at the end of the film version of Atonement. Where an older Briony within an author’s interview reflects on her final novel, revealing that she is dying. She has been diagnosed with vascular dementia. Consequently, It will be soon be difficult for Briony herself, to truly discern what is fact, past, present and fiction. As her dementia progresses, will she be able to trust her own eyes and her interpretation of reality?
Atonement will be her last novel. As it is revealed that Briony has given Robbie and Cecelia a happy ending in which they are reunited after being separated for many years. A future in which Robbie will be able to marry Cecelia and in his own words, live without shame. In reality, they were separated by Robbie’s sentence and subsequent imprisonment, and the outbreak of WW2. Robbie and Cecelia never saw each other again. At this point in the story, we have witnessed the full scope of the havoc of Briony’s childhood testimony against Robbie and its consequences. Briony’s testimony that saw with her own eyes her cousin Lola being raped by Robbie lead to his false imprisonment as a rapist. I think the fact that Briony walked in on Robbie and Cecelia in the infamous library scene, prior to her witnessing Lola’s attack is significant. Did the shock of her sister making love to Robbie in the library and her immature understanding of the nature of adult intimacy, ultimately colour what she saw later? The sense that we can make of a situation is incredibly subjective, based what we already know or what we have been indoctrinated to believe. Truth can be fungible. Briony in that moment did not understand what was inappropriate to her. What we understand as the truth is filtered through our experience and informs our interpretation. We cannot always trust what we attest to see with our own eyes. It is this conviction to one’s interpretation of a situation, that leads Briony to regret her actions and atone through fiction later in life.
All of which leads, in my mind, to a little more sympathy for Briony's fatal testimony in the book. Although changing the ending feels like deus ex machina, can we place that much blame on a child with a limited understanding of adult relationships?
In the film, the consequences of her actions are clear, but her motivations seem fairly simple. She endeavours to tell the truth of what she saw to right a wrong. Comparatively, within the original text Briony’s conviction’s seem vastly complex, caught up in a web of justification and self-invention, in her triumphantly over-the-top image of herself. The childish, creative arrogance that leads her to imagine herself an Olympic nettle-whacker in the scene above similarly leads her to imagine herself as a righter of wrongs and a champion of justice when she accuses Robbie. But it's even more complicated than that-she's also caught up in her transition between childhood and adulthood. In her writer's sense of narrative balance, and in her resentment over the fact that she wants to be mysterious and important, but she completely lacks secrets.
Nothing in her life was sufficiently interesting or shameful to merit hiding; no one knew about the squirrel's skull beneath her bed, but no one wanted to know. None of this was particularly an affliction; or rather, it appeared so only in retrospect, once a solution had been found…
To conclude this think piece, maybe this longing for secrets makes her less sympathetic. Her longing for experience that is expressed in her propensity to not tell the truth. An instinct to want to embroider, to lie, refashion reality. She puts words in Lola’s mouth it was Robbie Certainly in the book, she's a far more nuanced character, but maybe understanding her will just make readers hate her more. Anyone can get something wrong; it takes a particularly complicated, self-important, and childish conscience to get things this wrong. To misidentify a rapist. Which is why I must conclude that what she saw was filtered though her lack of understanding. What I dislike most is what this has to say about authors- that as Neil Gaimen puts it- all stories are pretty lies spun from the truth. Stories that lack truth can lack conviction and inhabit the suspension of disbelief. Briony’s childhood longing for secrets is phyric as she finds herself saddled with the load stone her adult understanding of events and thus her grown up regrets that ultimately give weigh to her stories as a novelist later in life. It has been noted that reading fiction is an empathic experience that can teach us to feel more broadly by immersing us in the lived or imagined lived experience of an ‘Other’.
Briony asks what value could a reader gain from knowing the truth of Robbie and Cecelia’s separation and deaths in its entirety? Especially when she lays out that she has tried to put forward and fully honest account of events in her last novel. What hope has complete honesty to offer? That we live in a world that lacks second chances and that consequences lead to regrets that are immutable? I think that through denying the conflict of the situation with the happy ending- Briony is being self indulgent, but then again she is a dying woman. She regrets not having the courage in the war to visit her sister before she died in the flooding of Balham station in October 1940 during the Blitz. This is where I have the least sympathy for her- in her cowardice. To quote my all time favourite Novel The Master and Margherita Cowardice is indeed the greatest sin. As cowards seek to save themselves both pain and humiliation by not confronting truth or avoiding stepping outside their comfort zone in life. A great quote that has stuck with me recently is a ship is safe in its harbour, but that’s not what ships are for…
On other reading notes, I have just finished reading Stolen Focus which is the book of the month at Rebel Book Club. Love those events and I will certainly make the next meeting. I am currently reading Kurt Vonnegut’s Mother Night and in non-fiction I’m reading Letters to Change the World. I also recommend Mayflies by Andrew O’Hagen and I’m curious to read his other book Be Near Me.